“Congress’ role in identifying and elevating intangible harms does not mean that a plaintiff
automatically satis¬fies the injury-in-fact requirement whenever a statute grants a person a statutory right
and purports to author¬ize that person to sue to vindicate that right. Article III standing requires a concrete injury
even in the context of a statutory violation.”
SPOKEO, INC. v. ROBINS,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,
No. 13–1339. Decided May 16, 2016
More